Oilfield Waste Control
a report by
Andrew K Wojtanowicz
Texaco Environmental Chair, and Professor, Craft and Hawkins Petroleum Engineering Department, Louisiana State University
The term ‘waste’ has been loosely used by various authors. For the purpose of this article, waste is defined using the system approach to any industrial process, i.e. activity such as manufacturing, construction (well drilling and completion) or extraction (petroleum production). As a system, the industrial process is functionally cut off from the market by the market boundary and is physically isolated from the environment by an environmental boundary, as shown in Figure 1. Any process including oilfield operations can be visualised as such an entity having both market and environmental boundaries.
Of course, manufacturing processes are best fitted to this schematic because their boundaries are visible and clearly defined. By contrast, oilfield processes do not have readily perceived environmental boundaries, particularly in the subsurface environment. However, they may generate subsurface pollution, which implies a flow of pollutants across a subsurface environmental boundary. The presence of such a boundary is implicit in the issues of borehole integrity and migration across confining (sealing) zones into underground sources of drinking water.
The surface boundary of the oilfield process is somewhat easier to define, but the decision is still based on subjective judgement rather than scientific definition. In drilling operations, for example, reserve pits were initially included in the drilling fluid circulation systems (hence the name ‘reserve’) and considered part of the drilling process. Later, the pits were often used as a waste dump that belonged to the environment. After well completion, reserve pits were either abandoned or opened and spread on the surrounding land. Today, on modern rig sites, reserve pits during drilling are carefully isolated from the surrounding environment and are closed promptly after well completion using various environmental techniques, described below. In this modern approach, reserve pits are considered part of the drilling process rather than part of the environment; they reside within the environmental boundary that surrounds the whole rig site and underlays the bottoms of the pits.
It also follows that no waste exists inside the process – just material streams. On leaving the process (i.e. crossing the process boundaries) a stream of material becomes either a product (including by-products) or waste. The difference stems from the market value of the material.
Andrew K Wojtanowicz is Texaco Environmental Chair and a Professor in the Craft and Hawkins Petroleum Engineering Department at Louisiana State University. He has held faculty positions at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology and the AGH University of Science and Technology in Krakow, Poland. Professor Wojtanowicz has also been a Visiting Distinguished Professor of Petroleum Engineering at the Petroleum Institute in Abu Dhabi.
E:
awojtan@lsu.edu
Having a positive market value, the material becomes a product. Material with zero value becomes waste. When the value is negative, the material becomes regulated waste, i.e. it involves a disposal cost.
Classification of Oilfield Waste
In the US, the most general classification of oilfield waste defines primary and associated waste categories. The classification considers the origin and volume of waste generated.
Wastes with a large volume and low toxicity constitute primary waste. The category of primary drilling waste comprises drilling mud and drill cuttings. The volume of primary drilling waste can be from five- to 10-fold larger than the volume of the wellbore and mud system as a result of a volumetric increase in the mud system while drilling – a phenomenon inherent in the drilling process. Oilfield primary production waste is the produced water and its volume is extremely large – exceeding the oil volume by three-fold (worldwide average) and by up to 50-fold in some areas. These very large volumes result from various mechanisms by which water invades wells – phenomena inherent in the oilfield processes of production and recovery.
Associated oilfield waste is considered as having a small volume and (possibly) high toxicity. In the drilling process, associated waste may include rigwash and service company wastes such as empty drums, drum rancid, spilled chemicals, spent acids and workover, swabbing, unloading or completion fluids. In production operations, most of the materials used and discarded fall into the associated waste category. A list of associated production waste is given in Table 1.
Waste Control
The concept of waste control depends on the position of the controlled material stream with respect to the process. A traditional ‘end-of-the- pipe’ waste management approach applies to the waste already discharged from a well site or production plant. It involves processing and disposing of the waste to comply with regulatory controls. Such waste management technology (WMT) is extraneous to the process because it operates outside the environment boundaries of the process. All offsite disposal services for oilfield operations fall into this category. Examples of alternative WMTs for production operations are:
• land farming; • incineration; • road spreading; •
commercial waste injection facilities; and • brine demineralisation plants.
WMT for drilling operations, other than those for production, include offshore hauling of drilling fluids and cuttings for onshore disposal. These techniques abate pollution without interfering with oilfield
118
© TOUCH BRIEFINGS 2010
HSE
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148