This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Ceramic Membranes for the Oilfield Produced Water Treatment


Its resistance to aggressive chemical solutions allows cleaning with those chemicals that do not compromise membrane performance. This is critical for waste streams with variable quality or a high propensity for membrane fouling.13


Membrane fouling remains a major obstacle to the application of membrane-based treatment of produced water.14,17


In general,


membrane lifetime and permeate fluxes are primarily affected by the phenomena of concentration polarisation and fouling at the membrane surface.14,15


Membrane fouling by oil emulsions is caused by the following. • • •


Accumulation of oil droplets at the membrane surface (cake layer formation and/or concentration polarisation).


Fouling from oil drops penetrating pores or adsorption onto the membrane surface.


Fouling layer compaction due to the permeation drag, which causes the membrane matrix to slightly reorganise, resulting in lowered volume porosity, increasing membrane resistance and thus lower fluxes.16


In the literature, many studies of membrane separation for oily wastewater treatment have been reported, particularly in MF, UF and RO with polymer membranes. Few studies, however, are related to the application of inorganic ceramic membranes on oily wastewater treatment.18,19


Membrane Transport and Fouling Research The membrane technology research group at the University of Applied Sciences Giessen-Friedberg in Germany is involved in a number of


studies of membrane processes, with particular emphasis on understanding membrane transport and fouling. The goal of its current research project is the application of a new generation of ceramic membranes for the efficient treatment of oilfield produced water.


The project focuses on the performance and characterisation of the membrane processes using different ceramic membranes when treating oilfield produced water generated from tank dewatering and different prepared model solutions at different process parameters. Membrane process performance was measured in terms of average flux rates, oil and total organic carbon removal efficiency.


To determine the separation capability of the processes described, various parameters, such as trans-membrane pressure, cross-flow velocity, influent oil concentration, salinity concentration, feed temperature and different membrane cleaning methods (chemical- and ultrasound-enhanced cleaning as well as back flushing), were investigated. A laboratory-scale multistage cross-flow filtration system mainly comprising tubular ceramic membranes, circulation pump, feed, permeate, retentate streams and back flushing was used throughout the investigation and is shown in Figure 2.


The single and combined treatment processes investigated here consisted of a pre-treatment step utilising MF (0.1 and 0.2μm pore size filters) and a multistage post-treatment step utilising cross-flow UF (0.05μm pore size and 20kDa MWCO filters) and NF (1 and 0.75kDa MWCO filters). Table 1 lists the properties of the ceramic membranes used. During the experimental period, samples from the concentrate


MIROS OIL SPILL DETECTION SYSTEM


OIL SPILL DETECTION BY MARINE X-BAND RADARS PROCESSING OF DIGITIZED RADAR IMAGES


MAIN FEATURES:  Early and automated detection of oil spills.  Day and night operation in fog and poor visibility.  Oil drift prediction with direction and speed.  Flexible user interface.  Wave, wind and surface current data.


AREAS OF USE:  Stand-by and oil recovery vessels participating in oil spill clean up operations.  Coast guard vessels for oil spill monitoring.  Oils rigs, FPSOs and tankers for oil spill monitoring.  Oil terminals and refineries for oil spill monitoring in the terminal area.


Developed in co-operation with NOFO – Norwegian Clean Seas Association for Operating Companies - measuring the ocean surface


Solbråveien 32, P.O. Box 364, NO-1372 Asker, Norway Tel: (+47) 66 98 75 00, Fax: (+47) 66 90 41 70 E-mail: office@miros.no, Web site: www.miros.no


MIROS OSD SYSTEM WELL VERIFIED AND INTERNATIONALLY ACCEPTED


PROVEN PRODUCT:  Tested in yearly oil-on-water excercises.  Used in real clean-up operations.  Adopted by international operators.


EASY INSTALLATION:  Miros System Computer with flat screen monitor.  Miros Integrated Video Digitizer.  Connects to the vessel's marine X-band radar.  Interfaces to the vessel's Gyro, GPS and Wind sensors.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116