Process Simulation for Improved Energy Efficiency
Table 4: Summary of Results of Investigated Cases for Medium-type Crude Oil
Property Feed
Capacity Case 5
Duty of HEN (MW) 51.75 HEN outlet
temperature (°C) 256
Firing rate of furnace (MW)
Tonnes CO2 /tonne crude
51.3 0.038 Case 6 Base 271 45.9 0.034 HEN = heat exchanger network; MW = megawatt. 56.65 Case 7
Crude ‘B’ Crude ‘B’ Crude ‘B’ Base
258 57.4 0.037 Case 8 Crude ‘B’
Base + 20% Base + 20% 59.37
64.38 273 52.5 0.034
However, the required firing rate in the atmospheric furnace was higher for Crude ‘B’ in every case investigated. The reason for this is that the rate of evaporation is higher for the lighter crude, requiring a higher heat load in the heater.
Table 4 shows that Crude ‘B’ can be processed at base capacity without any modification of the HEN because the required firing rate is lower than the maximum allowable of 53.34MW.
of the processing of medium-type crude oil (Crude ‘B’) at base and increased capacity was also carried out.
The first step of this part of the study was to investigate the distillation column for processing of Crude ‘B’. Table 1 shows the yield of atmospheric products was higher for Crude ‘B’ than for Crude ‘A’. This means a higher internal mass flow rate in the atmospheric column. Based on the calculation results, it can be stated that Crude ‘B’ can be processed at base capacity without violating any design parameters, considering the current tower internal arrangement.
On the contrary, the results of the calculation prepared with PRO/II software for introducing Crude ‘B’ at higher capacity (Base + 20%) showed that the flooding factor exceeded the 80% design limit in the upper, narrowed section of the column. Tray hydraulics were also investigated with KG–TOWER software. The programme gave warnings for the jet flood in the top tray and the downcomer flood in the top pumparound trays, which exceeded the design limits. This strengthens the previous results, indicating that trays in the top section should be changed.
One possible solution to overcome this bottleneck is to replace the currently applied conventional trays with high-capacity and high-performance trays. We recalculated the critical column section applying Superfrac® trays and all of the obtained parameters were below the design limits.
After the investigation of the distillation column, the crude oil preheating line and the atmospheric furnace were studied. During the calculation of processing Crude ‘B’ at base and increased capacity, fouling factors recommended by TEMA were applied and bypass of heat exchangers was not considered. The results of the study of HEN are summarised in Table 4.
Comparing the results summarised in Table 2 and Table 4 indicated that, at the same HEN configuration and feed rate (e.g. Case 1, Case
1. 2. 3.
Sikos L, Klemeš J, Reliability, availability and maintenance optimisation of heat exchanger networks, Appl Therm Eng, 2010;30:63–9.
Thernesz A, Varga Z, Rabi I, et al., Applying process design software for capacity increase and revamp of distillation units, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2010;12:97–103.
Gadalla M, Olujic Z, Sun L, et al., Pinch Analysis-Based Approach to Conceptual Design of Internally Heat-Integrated Distillation Columns, Chem Eng Res Des, 2005;83(A8):987–93.
42 4. 5. 6.
At increased capacity (Case 7) the calculated temperature of crude oil leaving the preheat line was 258°C and the total rate of heat transfer to the crude was 59.37MW, respectively. However, the results of the investigation of the atmospheric furnace showed that a coil inlet temperature of 265°C was needed to obtain the required coil outlet temperature (395°C) at a normal firing rate of 53.34MW. This clearly showed us that a fired heater is inadequate to heat up a higher-rate feed to the necessary temperature.
The aforementioned modifications of the HEN (based on pinch analysis) were added to the simulation model and their viability for processing Crude ‘B’ was also checked. Results showed (Case 8) that the total duty being exchanged between products and crude was increased by 5.01 to 64.38MW.
These data displayed that more than 50% of the maximum possible energy recovery was achieved. After the modification, the coil inlet temperature of the atmospheric furnace was 273°C, well above the required value. Based on the data summarised previously, it can be seen that the bottleneck of the furnace can be resolved by improving the efficiency of the HEN for processing Crude ‘B’ as well.
Additionally, implementation of modifications of the HEN improves the energy efficiency of the ADU considerably (see Case 6 in Table 4),
at base capacity, too. Comparing the specific CO2 emissions (tonnes CO2/tonne crude) of Case 6 with Case 5, it can be seen that CO2 emission can be decreased by 10.5%.
Conclusions
This article presents the results of a feasibility study for increasing crude processing capacity and improving energy efficiency and feed flexibility of a crude oil atmospheric distillation unit. Results show that boosting the distillation capacity was solved while improving the flexibility of the unit for processing different types of crude oil. Analysis of the HEN contributed to remove the bottleneck in atmospheric furnace capacity constraints as well as to a significant reduction in fuel consumption
and in CO2 emissions (11.3% for heavy-type crude and 10.5% for medium–type crude). n
Krár M, Kovács S, Kalló D, Hancsók J, Fuel purpose
hydrotreating of sunflower oil on CoMo/Al2O3 catalyst, Bioresources Technology, 2010;101:9287–93.
Lappas AA, Bezergianni S, Vasalos IA, Production of biofuels via co-processing in conventional refining processes, Catal Today, 2009;145:55–62.
Huber GW, Iborra S, Corma A, Synthesis of Transportation Fuels from Biomass: Chemistry, Catalysts, and Engineering, Chem Rev, 2006;106:4044–98.
7. Parkinson G, Capturing CO2, Chem Eng, 2008;12:16–20. 8.
9.
5, etc.), the rate of heat exchange between the crude and products (duty of HEN) was similar for both crude oils.
Praetorius B, Schumacher K, Greenhouse gas mitigation in a carbon constrained world: The role of carbon capture and storage, Energ Pol, 2009;37:5081–93.
Linnhoff B, Use Pinch Analysis to Knock Down Capital Costs and Emissions, Chem Eng Prog, 1994;90(8):33–57.
10. Zhelev T, The conceptual design approach – A process integration approach on the move, Resources, Conservat Recycl, 2007;50:143–57.
HYDROCARBON WORLD – VOLUME 6 ISSUE 1
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84