This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Electrochemical Technologies for Removing Petroleum Hydrocarbons from Produced Water Figure 2: Direct (A) and Indirect (B) Electro-oxidation Treatment


AB Pollutants


e-


Destroyed pollutants


Anode surface


Electrolyte Direct oxidation Adapted from Martínez-Huitle and Ferro, 2006.20


Figure 3: Electrochemical Plants and Cells Used in Electro-oxidation in Batch Operation Mode


Multimeter


Bipolar trickle tower reactor


Thermjacket Anode


Power supply


Peristaltic pump


Cathode


Water bath


pH meter Tank Peristaltic pump


One-compartment cell


Magnetic bar Anode


Magnetic stirrer


Turbulence promoter


Flow inlet


FM01-LC reactor Spacer


Anode


Off gas


Water bath


Cathode Tank


Flow cell parallel plate electrodes


Electrochemistry can be considered a credible alternative for the prevention of pollution problems. Intensive research is ongoing, with the goal of discovering more efficient techniques, processes, materials, technologies and applications for removing organic pollutants from wasterwaters.


Back plate Outlet


Flat plate electrodes


Gasket Electroreduction (ER)


Bipolar trickle tower reactor with a jacket for external thermostatisation (top left); one-compartment cell with parallel plate electrodes (top right); stirred two-electrode one-compartment tank reactor (bottom left); and filterpress flow cell FM01-LC reactor (bottom right).


A limited number of papers have been published dealing with the direct ER of petroleum hydrocarbons in aqueous solution on suitable cathodes.14


However, as the financial cost of the physical methods and chemicals used to treat hazardous sludge is high, the application of these methods is limited. Current methods cannot remove minute suspended oil and/or hazardous dissolved organic and inorganic components. Biological treatment is a cost-effective alternative method for removing dissolved and suspended compounds from oilfield wastewater in onshore extraction facilities. A considerable number of studies have been conducted to investigate new treatment technologies to remove the pollutants from produced water. Figure 1 summarises the main technologies used for the removal of these pollutants. Extensive information regarding the characteristics and applications of the main conventional technologies – including physico-chemical and chemical methods, advanced oxidation processes, microbiological treatments and biological decomposition – has been collected in an authoritative review.1


In contrast, only a few scientific studies have been published in recent years about the emerging electrochemical technologies that can be used to remove petrochemical pollutants from produced water.7–14 Additionally, there has been very recent advances in these promising methods.15–18


The reason for this low interest in this conventional electrochemical technique is that it offers poor decontamination of wastewaters compared with the more potent direct and indirect EO methods. An example is the elimination of PAHs,13–15


where the


principal degradation mechanism occurs through EO; however, a certain amount of PAHs is degraded by ER at the cathode surface.


Electrochemistry offers promising approaches for the prevention of pollution problems in the processing industries.


The abatement of these organic compounds has high priority, because they cause serious disequilibrium in aquatic environments, even dissolved in lower concentrations.


Electrocoagulation (EC)


This article will therefore present a general overview of laboratory and pilot plant experiments relating to the most relevant applications of electrochemical methods for removing petroleum hydrocarbons from produced water.


112


A traditional physico-chemical treatment of phase separation for the decontamination of petroleum hydrocarbons in wastewaters before discharge to the environment is coagulation. It consists in the addition of coagulating agents such as Fe3+ or Al3+ ions, usually in the form of


EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION – VOLUME 9 ISSUE 2


The main electrochemical methods for the removal of petroleum pollutants from wastewaters are electroreduction (ER), electroflotation, electrocoagulation (EC), electro-oxidation (or electrochemical oxidation [EO]) with different anodes and indirect electro-oxidation (IEO) with active chlorine. Emerging technologies, including electro-Fenton (EF) and photoassisted systems such as photoelectro-Fenton (PEF) and photoelectrocatalysis (PEC), have recently received great attention. The fundamentals of each of these technologies will be briefly outlined here to help better understand their advantages and limitations in the environmental prevention of pollution by petroleum hydrocarbons from produced water.


Anode surface


e- Oxidant Electrolyte Indirect oxidation Mediator


Oxidation in the bulk


Destroyed pollutants


Pollutants Electrochemical Methods


Other advantages are its versatility, energy efficiency, amenability to automation and cost-effectiveness. Electrochemistry has reached a promising stage of development and can now be effectively used for the destruction of toxic or biorefractory agents.20,21


Electrochemistry, as a branch of physical chemistry, plays an important role in most areas of science and technology. Electrochemistry offers promising approaches for the prevention of pollution problems in the processing industries. Its inherent advantage is its environmental compatibility, due to the fact that it uses a clean reagent, the electron.19,20


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124