This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Faults and Fractures in Carbonates


In Figure 4D, we show data concerning the permeability structure computed for individual fault zones crosscutting basinal and slope-to-platform carbonates of central and southern Italy. All fault zones are characterised by high values of Fa indices, which means that the fault damage zone are thicker than the relative fault cores, suggesting a ‘distributed conduit’ permeability structure. Quantitative data of porosity (φ) and Klinkemberg permeability (k) measured for samples collected across large normal fault crosscutting tight platform carbonate rocks (φ <1%; k = 10-3 millidarcy [mD]) show that both values increase within the fault damage zone (up to φ = 3% and k = 10-1 mD) whereas they reach host rock values within the fault core (φ <1%, k = 10-4 mD).21


Recent papers14,20,22 demonstrated that the general validity of this


deformational-hydraulic characterisation of fault zones is influenced by several factors, among which the most relevant are:


• amount of fault displacement; • 3D fault geometry; • fault propagation mode; •


• pre-existing deformation; • •


Figure 4: Fault Volume Characteristics A


B Distributed conduit % Damage zone High % core


Low High


High Damage zone Fault core Protolith


100 10 1


% Damage zone Combined conduit-barrier


CD Ks increases


F4 F2


0.1 0.5 F1


F3 F5


1


100 150 200 250 300


50 0


0


0.5 Fa


A: Fault zone components; B: permeability structure; C: hydraulic properties of conduit-type faults (modified from Caine et al.,19964


Italy (from Cello et al., 200116 shear sense and fault kinematics; mechanical properties of fault rocks; and environmental conditions (i.e. overburden and pore fluid pressure).


As an example, the number of fractures away from the main slip surfaces varies in a different manner across normal and strike-slip faults that formed at the same time, but in different lithologies (see Figure 5B).


); D: permeability structure of the main fault zones in basinal carbonates outcropping in central ). FA = damage zone width/fault zone width; Ks = Klinkemberg permeability.


The impact of the aforementioned factors on the final architecture of fault zones implies that current predictive models of fault permeability are characterised by significant uncertainties. The reduction of these uncertainties is a primary target in the exploitation and management of the available geofluid resources. Most of the contributions included in a recent special issue of the Journal of Structural Geology15


provide new tools to better assess the fault architecture and related permeability structure in the subsurface. n


1 Localised barrier


Permeability structure


Low Low Low


% core High


Localised conduit


aim to


CASING RUNNING TOP TO BOTTOM  


HydroFORM™ 


  


CRTi 





  


 


  





 and reciprocate


  Casing Sizes: 41/2”–185/8”+ 


4110 - 56 Avenue NW, Edmonton, AB Canada T6B 3R8 +1.780.490.5185 volantproducts.ca





   Casing Sizes: 41/2”–133/8”





  


Fault zone width (m)


Ks increases Fault zone width (m)


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124